After working intensively with SpecFlow for a while now I have experienced something that I think is common. After a while you have all the steps you need… Or rather, if you write your step regular expressions carefully you’ll end up with a little language that automates the running of your application. So if you stay within the supported language you can simply write Gherkin. In Swedish for example.

It’s really cool to write Swedish that tells what the application should do. And it does it. I wrote about that experience before. The extension of this is that non-developers soon can start to write the specs and run them without any steps needed to be developed. But to do that you’ll need to have communicate which steps are supported.

Also after a while the supported regular expressions steps can be...

I have been using White in our project for a couple of days now and it’s looking good I must say. I use White in conjunction with SpecFlow to get our specifications in an executable format (that still makes me smile everything I think of it…)

What I soon realized was that much of the White-automating could be pushed to a base class… That is much of the stuff that we’re using and the way we’ll like to do stuff can be pushed downwards.

However – I think that the result is pretty generic and can be used outside our project. So if you need it you can have it.

Well known names

The first thing that we’ve thought about was the fact that most user doesn’t refer to the items in the GUI by the programming name (“So I clicked the btnSearch2-button”, doesn’t sound...

I’ve already posted this snippet in C#, but as I from time to time need it in VB.NET I’ll post that too. Here you go:

<?xml version=”1.0” encoding=”utf-8” ?> <CodeSnippets xmlns=”http://schemas.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/2005/CodeSnippet”>     <CodeSnippet Format=”1.0.0”>         <Header>             <Title>TestMethod</Title>             <Shortcut>tm</Shortcut>             <Description>Code snippet for creating a testmethod</Description>             <Author>Marcusoft (www.marcusoft.net)</Author>             <SnippetTypes>                 <SnippetType>Expansion</SnippetType>                 <SnippetType>SurroundsWith</SnippetType>             </SnippetTypes>         </Header>         <Snippet>             <Declarations>                 <Literal>                     <ID>methodName</ID>                     <ToolTip>The name of the test</ToolTip>                     <Default>methodName</Default>                 </Literal>             </Declarations>             <Code Language=”VB”>               <![CDATA[<TestMethod()> _               Public Sub should_$methodName$()         ‘ Arrange

        ‘ Act

        ‘ Assert         Assert.Fail(“Implement test!”)     End Sub]]>             </Code>         </Snippet>     </CodeSnippet> </CodeSnippets>

I often get to work with brilliant people. That’s one the real benefits of being a consultant, I would argue. Last week I got to know Thomas Gyllencreutz that came onboard my project. He didn’t waste any time to get the performance in our virtual development environments to new heights. This post is a condensation of his findings that really got our Virtual PC images flying. A general performance tip is to put your virtual hard drive (.vhd-file) on a separate hard drive, as suggested by mr Hanselmann. OK, to get the multi-core support you’ll need to find out how many cores your system have. The easiest way to do that is to open Task Manager (CTRL+SHIFT+Esc) and check the number of CPU-boxes under the performance tab: Read More

The last month I’ve read The Goal by Eliyahu M. Goldratt. Apart from being a great book it was also written in a really interesting way. It’s a novel in which we follow mr Alex Rogo and how he learns the subject of the book Theory of Constraints. I thought that I might try to mimic that style a bit in this post.

The subject I’m getting back to again and again nowadays is agile for the whole project. In my opinion agile thoughts often come from development and never gets a good foothold in the analysis/requirements or in the testing departments. “Yes, by all means… Do this agile you like so much but please let us write the specs and test cases as we always have done.” – is a common reasoning where I’ve been.

OK – on to the story. It comes...

It’s been a while since I blogged. Twitter is taking over. I compensate that with a major blog post.

Background

I written about the project I’m in right now a couple of times before and to make a long story short; we don’t have any requirements! We only have the existing application which we are to “convert” from VB6 to VB.NET. 1:1 is the mantra – which is to be understood as: functional the same.

I have suggested for the team that we work with BDD (or ATDD if you like) to create the requirements as we go. They liked it. A lot!

To not let this post grow totally out of control, I leave the description for that process to another post.

To put my money where my mouth is and show them how it should be accomplished. This blog post is...

OK – this might not be one of my ordinary subjects but this was soooo annoying. Sometimes when I closed the lid of my MacBook Pro there were something still running. This caused the battery to drain in about 20 minutes and the computer to go very, very hot. For the first time ever I actually burned myself on a computer.

I have checked around the net for a solution, and even went into a MacStore but as the error comes and goes there’s not much security in the tips.

As suspected one process doesn’t have time to close down and just keeps running. But which one?

In my case it was something called Safe Sleep (that prevents unsaved data from being lost if the power goes out). This is disabled by the following commands in a Terminal window:

sudo pmset -a hibernatemode 0 sudo...
      

Read More