I have been using White in our project for a couple of days now and it’s looking good I must say. I use White in conjunction with SpecFlow to get our specifications in an executable format (that still makes me smile everything I think of it…)
What I soon realized was that much of the White-automating could be pushed to a base class… That is much of the stuff that we’re using and the way we’ll like to do stuff can be pushed downwards.
However – I think that the result is pretty generic and can be used outside our project. So if you need it you can have it.
Well known names
The first thing that we’ve thought about was the fact that most user doesn’t refer to the items in the GUI by the programming name (“So I clicked the btnSearch2-button”, doesn’t sound like an end user, huh?). No, they rather speak about the elements in some more loosely terms such as “the search button”, “the name text field” etc. The well known names of the UI-elements if you will
To solve that I’ve created an interface (IIdResolver) that is used to resolve the ID from the well known name the user is using. How – I hear you ask… Well – that’s the beauty of interface – he answered with a smile. You can change that implementation if you want to. If you want to get the ID’s from a constant file or a database or whatever you simply have to implement IIdResolver (one method) and do that resolving.
I have created two implementations; one real simple one that uses convention based naming and one that uses AutomationProperties. By no means do I claim to understand all of this but to my understanding these are properties that can be used when automating an UI Interface. And the AutomationProperties.Name seemed like a perfect fit for my need.
So I created a White finder that looks for the AutomationProperties.Name with the well known name and returns the ID for that control. It works fine and gives us a simple yet powerful way of keeping the specifications in a format that the user understands.
I’ve also included a couple of methods for asserting stuff (is this text in this textbox, is this node in this tree etc.) and to do that I had to introduce some references to MSTest in my code. That works for us but doesn’t make the code all generic. I might update that to throw exceptions further down the road.
Basic steps – basic language
As I wrote my steps I realized that many steps could be reused if formulated in a certain way. “Given I click on the button ‘[wellknown name]’” and “Given I click on the tree ‘[wellknown name]’” could simply be “Given I click on ‘[wellknown name]’” to support clicking on all type of controls. In this way I could create a small base language that I could use to simply the step-classes for the “real” tests. With the support for steps in external assemblies that SpecFlow has this became a very nice foundation for our language. The stuff I’ve added so far is very basic but works as a start.
The code and example
I have put together a small example that simply uses my functions. The code can be found on GitHub.
What I’ve learned
During writing the steps so far I’ve learned a lot. Here are some highlights:
- When I first could write a scenario and run it without writing any new steps was a really strange and joyful experience. I told the application what it should do (in Swedish) and it just did that…
- I had a real strange bug for a while. I used the Window.Keyboard.HoldKey-method and forgot to call .LeaveKey… Which meant that the Control-key of my keyboard was registered as being pressed all the time. White uses your computer to automate the application. Some strange situations may occur.
- The performance of White is a bit slow. Especially some operations, such as traversing trees etc. This don’t worry me so much since this is integrationtest. It’s ok for them to take a while. But beware so that you don’t put this in places which is run over and over. BeforeScenario or as Gehrkin Background. Also check out this to get much better (1/4 of the time) performance. Use WithCache
- Also beware that the attributes that SpecFlow looks for can be found in any class. And can be applied multiple times. That means that BeforeFeature and AfterScenario can be applied multiple times, if you don’t watch yourself.
- Take advantage of the fact that the attributes can be applied multiple times. Sometimes the same action-step can be reused as both a Given and a Then.
- The name of the Step-method is not nearly as important as the attributes.
If you liked this post ... here's more for you:
Published byon Last updated